Page 1 of 2

Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 4:07 am
by Haunter
Hi everyone,
I am curious to know among you if emotional bond is someting necessary for you to have sex with someone, or not.

To me, that am still a virgin you know, I think the answers would be "Yes, absolutely". In fact renouncing to it would let me feel uncomplete and so not able to let me go totally.

Re: Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 12:23 am
by ohmyanal
Emotional bonding is awesome, makes orgasms awesome too! But I'm also one for straight up non attached butt-sex!

In fact I've been in a couple porn vids when I was way younger (legal mind you), it was mostly anal goth creampie based.

For the life of me I can't find any of those clips online, I think the guy who did them went out of business... anyway.

Instead of making random slams with strangers I help anal sites get their shit done and find people. It's hobby though...

Okay I'm rambling....

Re: Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:12 am
by Haunter
ohmyanal wrote:Instead of making random slams with strangers I help anal sites get their shit done and find people. It's hobby though...

What do you mean?

(Thanks for answering by the way)

Re: Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:17 pm
by AnalObsession
I'm in the group that also needs an emotional, intimate, even romantic attachment, which admittedly is something I often feel very bad about. Not only do I not do casual sex (much less casual butt sex) but I don't even really do play partners or FWB. Which I'm chastised for a lot, I've tried to be different and get these things to work, but it just doesn't do it for me.

Re: Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 12:40 am
by Haunter
AnalObsession wrote:I'm in the group that also needs an emotional, intimate, even romantic attachment, which admittedly is something I often feel very bad about. Not only do I not do casual sex (much less casual butt sex) but I don't even really do play partners or FWB. Which I'm chastised for a lot, I've tried to be different and get these things to work, but it just doesn't do it for me.

Thank you AnalObsession, I'm glad to see I'm not alone. I don't consider ours a drawback anyway; I would say just a double-edge trait.

Re: Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:40 am
by Buttwoman
You can have sex with someone you love, or someone you know, or all by yourself. It's like pizza, always pretty good.

Re: Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:41 am
by F655A
Yeah, I'm weird too.
If I have sex with someone, there's an automatic emotional bond of some sort. I don't intend it, it just happens.
Knowing this, I can never have sex with someone unless an emotional bond with them would be a welcome thing.

So, wisdom tells me emotional involvement is an inevitable consequence.
My sex drive just tells me, "what are you waiting for?"

Re: Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:11 am
by Sgt_Valk
It doesn't have to be emotional for me. If I'm horny and it is readily available, chances are i will take up the offer. And just because you don't share strong emotions with your sex partner, doesn't mean that the sex itself can't be passionate and fulfilling.

Re: Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:28 am
by Haunter
Personally, I can understand your point but to me that approach doesn't work. I'm not criticizing it but doing so to me would mean splitting the body from the real person in front of me. Even if the beautiful lady were an ologram with a synthetic brain, say, I would strongly want to know her as a being, first. Furthermore, if a woman I like physically were mentally against me I would feel almost no attraction I guess.

Re: Emotional involvement: is it necessary?

Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 2:47 am
by 65andFree
Heck no, and in my case my anal talents paid for a large part of college.

Women, of course, can perform while thinking about all kinds of shit. The first time I took a cock up my ass I was 19, he was 45, and I chatted with his wife as he pounded away in me. She told me it would take him about 30 mins to cum, but that it was worth it since he would shoot at least six thick wads anywhere I wanted them. She was right - he came 7 or 8 times, so there was plenty for my mouth, tits and asshole. While he rested, she ate my ass clean.

After that, I couldn't get enough cock, but the business woman in me said why not make my asshole golden. If I charged a lot for anal, maybe a horny guy would figure it was special. Soon I was in demand. On most days, I had two or more clients. These guys wanted a talented and willing ass to fuck quickly - no emotion there, except lust for them and greed for me. If I worked my scheduling right, I often would get fucked by one guy who split as soon as he came. Then I'd try to have a client who was into eating my ass clean (a huge favorite for lots of men who won't admit it). Then he'd fuck what he had just eaten. You see?