Anal Only Lifestyle Forum

Well, let's turn ourselves to philosophers for a while...

Usually one defines an orientation, namely a preference for sexual partners, as straight, bi-man, bi-woman, gay, lesbian etc. But what do they mean? What do these have in common? They refer to the physical nature of the partner, that is his/her gender. Ok, let's label this as "level 0".
What does prevent one from stepping up to "level 1"? For example, a male might like only... Bi-women! So he is interested, further than in the physical nature of his partner, on her preferences. Or maybe he could be only attracted to, say, lesbians: maybe knowing she is attracted only to women is a huge turn on for him! You cannot tell him he's wrong, it's a perfect respectable line!
Good. Going further on, one could step up and reach "level 3". An example: we could have a man who is attracted (only) by... Women who are attracted (only) by... Bi-women. Also this, even if more sophisticated, is a perfect clear preference. It's just one step beyond "level 2".

What I'm picturing is that going on one could build a matrioska-game complicated at will, in which all sexual preferences are of course more and more unusual but legitimate. I guess the very first steps might occur in real life, somewhere.
Have you ever thought to this this way?

PS I'm not a pervert. More likely a free thinker/mathmatician

Apparently you haven't yet discovered​ that human sexuality is a spectrum that defies convenient classification, in the same way that all the faces in the world are different.

By trying to classify people you are only limiting yourself

Well, you're right: one can't prove my extended meta-classification covers all cases (I too think it doesn't, due to immense variety in possible tastes in mankind), but the fun fact I observed is that, even if tangling and weird, it states true possibilities. Maybe on a practical application interesting cases would be low in numbers, but that's good as well. It's a nice (theorical) insight on possible psicological legitimate preferences. Let's take it more as a (true) game rather than general phisical-herotic rules

One of my best friend is bisexual. She says she's a woman who likes women who likes men who likes women... but not only

This is a classic of the queer community, at least in France.

French Lover wrote:One of my best friend is bisexual. She says she's a woman who likes women who likes men who likes women... but not only

This is a classic of the queer community, at least in France.

Thank you French Lover! Your friend supports my thinking
Any further example is welcomed

There's a fine line between philosophy and stoner logic. You just shot yourself five miles past that lien out of a cannon.