Buttwoman wrote:And I hate every label.
Labels are given by insecure people, so they know what they aren't.
We are attracted to people, and we have sex with people (I hope). It's the attraction that matters, not what we call it.
I really liked what you said there; it's very rare in these days people recognizing we're attracted to people (and the underlying importance of that). I would like to add a "detail", though. Yes, we are (ideally) attracted to people, but that doesn't mean people don't belong to specific
Umwelten. Children are people but that doesn't put them in the same category as adults. Same goes for males and females, each belonging to their particular worldviews (within certain ranges, obviously). Having that said, what we call it/name it can have relevance insofar as males and females belong to different Umwelten: there are different reasons for being attracted to men or women and different reasons for a person to be attracted to others of the same or different Umwelten, so, "labeling" isn't
just a useless classification.
AnalAnnaLisa wrote:
Males and females have anuses. Focusing on the anus has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Except that you like ass
That's partially true but, as Buttwoman pointed very accurately, we are attracted to
people. That means we can't really like "asses" (unless we're taken by great perversion) for in this case the person would be completely erased and replaced by a hole (which would be an extreme objectification). Following the previous example, children (and corpses, and elephants...) also have asses but that doesn't mean a normal person would be attracted to it.
We are attracted to parts of the bodies only to the extent that they represent/symbolize something
about that person
in that body. E.g., wide hips in a woman means she's
probably very womanly; same thing for broad shoulders or body hair in a man, etc.