Buttwoman wrote:Also, I think one thing won't change quickly- How I learned to have anal sex. I stuck my ass in the air, and said 'Go for it'.
Some kind of lube was used at least, I hope?
Buttwoman wrote:Also, I think one thing won't change quickly- How I learned to have anal sex. I stuck my ass in the air, and said 'Go for it'.
analsexonly wrote:Analonely wrote: Western civilization doesn't have any book or even a cohesive compilation of texts regarding lovemaking. What we do have is science and worse—scientism — barging their ways into a domain which doesn't concern them, just like they've been doing for too long past due in pretty much every domain. It even bore the hideous phenomenon of sex coaches (among many others).
Lovemaking is a subject that must be taught by the family and the family alone.
Utterly ridiculous.
Analonely wrote:analsexonly wrote:Analonely wrote: Western civilization doesn't have any book or even a cohesive compilation of texts regarding lovemaking. What we do have is science and worse—scientism — barging their ways into a domain which doesn't concern them, just like they've been doing for too long past due in pretty much every domain. It even bore the hideous phenomenon of sex coaches (among many others).
Lovemaking is a subject that must be taught by the family and the family alone.
Utterly ridiculous.
I love constructive rebuttals like this one so I'll give it a shot to see how amazingly productive it can be on the long run: I find your comment 'Utterly ridiculous.' to be utterly ridiculous.
French Lover wrote:And when you discuss about something very specific (anal only...), you tend to become more extreme as the talk goes.
Haunter wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:36 pmAnalonely wrote:analsexonly wrote:
Utterly ridiculous.
I love constructive rebuttals like this one so I'll give it a shot to see how amazingly productive it can be on the long run: I find your comment 'Utterly ridiculous.' to be utterly ridiculous.
Here I must agree with Analonely: provided I'm not judging the content of his thought, I also think confutations should be explained, and this shall be a good case. In fact Analonely wasn't logically contradictory nor aggressive